Fair Abortion Discussions

2006-08-02 [Jewl]: censorship on my page was there for the protection and safety of each side. Your comments were deleted for the same reason anyone's comment on your page would be.

2006-08-02 [Dil*]: THEN WHY WAS THE ARGUEMENT REGARDING THE ORGAN DONATION EXAMPLE DELETED? such an arguement would definately not be deleted on my wiki, and also the link to this page on your page was deleted. What are you afraid of? Has it become apparent to you, even, that your page is slanted and that all the pro-choicers will eventually leave in disgust?

2006-08-02 [Dil*]: I cleared up the confusion about the phrase open-minded and provided an excellent example of what is open-minded and what is not. Furthermore, you did not ban the other person who wrote flamey comments.

2006-08-03 [Cliché]: Hey, Dil. Introducing Pro-choicer to extreme. But both your pages have a problem. To be honest. Her's is owned by a pro-lifer, yours is owned by a pro-choicer. The bias will be there.

2006-08-03 [Fizban]: lol, looking at the people on this wiki so far it will definetly. The first pro-lifer here, believes Roe vs Wade was very important to people everywhere in the country, and although greatly wishes most people to choose to be smart and safe, rather then dumb and stupid about sex,...understands and respects the choice, as well as the need to be able to choose. So far, this will definetly be a left sided biased wiki...

2006-08-03 [M_Sinner]: Pro-life, here. Not much to say this instant, but I'll likely be popping my head in here. I'm not very appreciative of censorship, short of deleting a message full of racist, sexist jokes linked to porn sites.

2006-08-03 [Cliché]: [This is taking from the last wiki, we're moving over here- I'm pro-choice, and I have a bit of a different way of looking at this whole thing. You've all heard the "oh, it's not human yet" or the "Woman's right, etc" All good points, but I got another. There are roughly 6 billion people in the world. A very small percentage lives in peaceful and/or non-poverty ridden lives. Now, do we really need more people in the world? No. And as much as I would love people to stop fucking for a little while and thin us out, we won't. Instead, how about all those kids that are going to live shitty lives. "Sorry honey, mommy wanted to get rid of you but the state

2006-08-03 [Cliché]: [Then - Sine 'Mac'tia Semper: That's an old one, too. I think that we've got enough population control going on right now, what with war and disease. And, at the very least I can say that disease is a "Natural" population control. War and Abortion certainly don't quialify for that

2006-08-03 [Cliché]: [And- Enough? Of course we don't have enough. There are waaayyy too many of us. It's insane really. And I don't think you use the word natural to much effect on humans. We are such unnatural creatures. There's nothing much left of us that is natural any more. And what makes war unnatural anyways? It's one of the few things left in us that is. Humans fight, naturally. It's what we do.

2006-08-03 [Fizban]: Hey sine...who would have thought you of all people would be pro-life ;)

2006-08-03 [M_Sinner]: I'd like you to name one thing about humans that's unnatural.

2006-08-03 [Fizban]: She isnt talking about our actual phisology, I do believe she is speaking of our lifestyles...

2006-08-03 [tuff ghost]: HA! Yes, but even in our bodies. Metal rods to set bones, pacemakers. None of that is naturally occuring, no? Then the fact that we drive cars, watch movies, are ashamed of our natural bodies, and eat microwave popcorn.

2006-08-03 [M_Sinner]: Nor are termite mounds, nor are beaver dams, nor are even the sticks that apes use to get the termites OUT of their mounds. The only difference I see is that we've got a larger brain capacity, and have taken the idea of tools to a much further level. If you're going to argue that human tools are unnatural, then please concede that most of nature is unnatural.